LHC restores family pensions for Punjab daughters

The Rawalpindi Bench of the Lahore High Court has struck down a Punjab government decision that cut off family pensions for widowed, divorced and unmarried daughters after the death of their government-employed parents. The court has ordered the payment of family pensions to all affected women.

Justice Ahsan Raza Kazmi announced the reserved verdict in the case. The rule had been challenged by an affected woman, Ms Falak Shah, and by Tanveer Sohail Shah, a former president of the District Bar Association Rawalpindi. The court rejected the arguments and material presented by the Punjab Finance Department and the assistant advocate general.

The ruling restores a benefit that many families had lost. It also sets a clear test for how far a provincial government can go when it changes pension rules in the name of saving money.

What the 2024 notification did

In 2024, the Punjab Finance Department issued a notification restricting eligibility for family pensions to widows. Divorced, unmarried and widowed daughters lost the right to receive a pension after the death of their parents.

The decision led to the discontinuation of family pensions for daughters of thousands of employees across 42 government departments in Punjab, according to the Tribune report. For households that depended on that income, the loss was direct and immediate.

Counsel for the petitioners argued that divorced, widowed and unmarried daughters were entitled to pensions in all other provinces of Pakistan. They said the Punjab notification had deprived women in the province of a right enjoyed elsewhere in the country.

They also argued that the notification violated Article 25 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality among citizens. In their submission, it amounted to discriminatory treatment of daughters in Punjab.

The court agreed with the lawyers. It annulled the notification and ordered the restoration of family pensions for all daughters in Punjab who were widowed, divorced or unmarried.

Why the ruling matters beyond one case

Family pensions are not a bonus. For many households, they are the main income after the death of a parent who worked in government service. A daughter who is widowed or divorced, or who never married, may have no other regular income. Cutting that pension off can push a household into hardship at the very moment it loses its earner.

The case also raises a wider question about pension reform. Governments across Pakistan face pressure to control pension bills, which grow every year as more employees retire. Courts, however, have repeatedly held that savings cannot come at the cost of rights already promised to dependents.

That tension is visible in the reaction to this verdict. Pensioners associations, teachers organisations and the All Pakistan Clerks Association welcomed the ruling, according to Express News reporting. The assistant advocate general indicated that the Punjab government may challenge the single-bench decision through an intra-court appeal.

An appeal, if filed, would not automatically cancel the order. It would, however, leave affected families waiting to see whether the restoration survives a second hearing. The government has not yet confirmed whether it will appeal.

What happens next

The immediate effect of the verdict is straightforward. The Punjab government must pay family pensions to the women who were deprived of the benefit under the 2024 notification. That includes women across the 42 departments affected by the change.

The practical work now falls to the Finance Department and the departments concerned. They will need to identify the affected cases, restore payments and deal with arrears for the period during which pensions were stopped. The Tribune report does not state a deadline for that process, and affected families may need to approach their parent departments to confirm their restored status.

For women in a similar position in other provinces, the ruling is a useful precedent rather than a direct order. The petitioners argued that daughters in other provinces already kept this entitlement. The judgment therefore brings Punjab into line with the practice elsewhere, instead of creating a new right from scratch.

The case also serves as a reminder for policymakers. Any future change to pension eligibility will need to pass the equality test in Article 25. A rule that singles out one group of dependents, without a lawful and reasonable basis, is likely to face the same challenge again.

—

Sources and prior coverage

• The Express Tribune, “LHC strikes down rule restricting family pension” (29 October 2026): https://tribune.com.pk/story/2637511/lhc-strikes-down-rule-restricting-family-pension
• Dunya News, “LHC strikes down family pension law, orders payments to eligible women” (28 October 2026, first reporting of the verdict): https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/980051-lhc-strikes-down-family-pension-law-orders-payments-to-eligible-women